Dr Alistair Hann: February 14, 2019
Building a National Digital Platform for health and social care data is a huge undertaking, and in a recent blogpost, NES Chairman David Garbutt asked “where do we start – which route should we take through the landscape of systems?” We have now started building the platform to make health information available across and health and social care - this is our chosen route.
The national digital platform is a huge thing to tackle – making sure that citizens and the workforce have access to all the information they need at the point of care, whether it was originally recorded in a hospital, GP practice, or at home. That means getting information in and out of thousands of systems. We could start by moving all the data in those thousands of existing systems into the new platform. The problem with that is it would take a lot of time, cost a lot of money, and at the end we might not have what we needed.
That type of delivery approach has been taken by many public sector IT projects in the past – years of procurement producing a set of requirements the size of a telephone book, and when the solution is delivered for tens or hundreds of millions of pounds, the world has moved on. Unfortunately, that is typically compounded by a decade of lock-in until a new system can be introduced (assuming that is possible, given systems often lock-in knowledge and data). In the time between procurements, punitively expensive change requests can be made - although there are many instances of vendors refusing to make changes or even fix bugs.
There are alternative approaches. Henrik Kniberg has blogged about a diagram he uses (and shown above). It shows two approaches to delivering a car – the first is built in stages (a wheel, then wheels on a chassis, then a body, and finally a steering wheel) and the customer doesn’t have anything useful until the very end. In the second approach, each stage of development ships something useful: a skateboard, then a scooter, bicycle, motorbike, and finally a convertible. Every one of these is a better way of getting from A to B, and at each stage something is learned – e.g. without handles a Skateboard is quite unstable, so the scooter has handles. Every step delivers something that solves the problem and we learn from every step.
We are taking the same approach - rather than the lengthy expensive public sector IT procurements of the past - building a series of small applications, that build out the functionality of the platform. That way we make something that improves the quality of care from the very first delivery, and we can learn from that before we build anything else.
The first of the applications we are building is to help people communicate how they wish to be treated if they are unable to communicate in an emergency. There is a new process being adopted across the UK called ‘ReSPECT’. Borrowing from their website:
"ReSPECT is a process that creates personalised recommendations for a person’s clinical care in a future emergency in which they are unable to make or express choices. It provides health and care professionals responding to that emergency with a summary of recommendations to help them to make immediate decisions about that person’s care and treatment. ReSPECT can be complementary to a wider process of advance/anticipatory care planning.
The plan is created through conversations between a person and their health professionals. The plan is recorded on a form and includes their personal priorities for care and agreed clinical recommendations about care and treatment that could help to achieve the outcome that they would want, that would not help, or that they would not want".
The way that a ReSPECT plan might currently be implemented can be challenging – the respect plan would start as a paper form that was filled in by hand. It would then be scanned in to be part of the ‘digital’ clinical record, then a copy would need to be printed out and put in the house. If a small change was needed, a whole new form would need to be filled out, scanned and printed. In the event of an emergency, how would paramedics know whether there was any form, where to find it, and whether it was the most up to date copy?
To implement an effective version:
All these things are achievable with the new platform, which at its core is a patient-centred record that can be accessed and contributed to across care, and by citizens themselves. The amount of information being captured in the ReSPECT plan is quite modest – the paper form is only two pages of A4 long - but by delivering it, we are creating something much bigger: that first version of the national platform, with a person-centred record shared across care in Scotland.
We will then work to expand the functionality, for example, by making the application cover other types of ‘Anticipatory Care Plan’ and care plans for chronic conditions. Each time, we can do this by delivering a little bit more functionality, and learning from the feedback we get, before going further. In parallel, we can start using the platform to support other health and social care applications in the process of development, that also need to be able to read and write to a national patient-centred record .
As a bonus, because we are using a standard called openEHR, we can re-use data across these plans – avoiding re-entry of data. It also means the data is portable between different systems, and the clinical knowledge to build them is in the public domain – moving us away from some of the other challenges of current systems that were mentioned above.
This modest application is the start of our route towards a full platform, that takes us away from the challenges of existing systems, and we will learn from every step we take.